Why Startups Choose to Bootstrap Over Seeking Investors

Many startups consider external funding as a necessary step to scale their businesses. However, bootstrapping, or funding a startup internally through personal savings, can be a viable and sustainable approach. Below, we explore the reasons behind why startups opt for the bootstrapping route rather than seeking investors.

Lack of Funds

While bootstrapping can only sustain a business to a certain point, it remains a preferable option for many startups. The primary reason is the lack of available funds. Starting a company involves initial investments, such as product development, marketing, and hiring. These expenses are often difficult for startups to cover without external funding. Bootstrapping allows for a more cautious approach, ensuring that every dollar counts.

Understanding the Realities of Fundraising

Entrepreneurs often underestimate the challenges of fundraising. Raise venture capital? Eighty-nine percent of your time, money, and effort will be spent in failure. For every 100 meetings with potential investors, only one might lead to funding. This ratio is not just academic—it reflects the harsh reality of the venture capital (VC) industry.

Fundraising is a rigorous process that requires a significant amount of time and energy. It's not a side hustle; it becomes the primary focus, often overshadowing the actual business. Imagine climbing a mountain: you're just about to reach the peak when someone kicks you down. This symbolizes the unpredictable nature of fundraising, where success is not guaranteed and failure might follow shortly after a glimmer of hope.

Do You Really Need Venture Funding?

Consider whether venture funding is genuinely necessary. Many entrepreneurs mistakenly believe that raising funds will speed up growth. However, this might not be the case. As an example, a CEO with a company boasting a 5 million Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) and a 100% year-over-year growth rate pondered about raising venture funding. Upon further discussion, it was determined that the key constraint to growth was hiring great talent, not funding.

Moreover, if your startup isn't aligned with the segments that VCs typically invest in, securing funding might be more challenging. Not all business models fit into the VC gold mine, and that's perfectly fine. The quality of the business doesn't diminish just because it's not venture-backed.

Natural Growth Rates and Venture Fundability

Each business has its own growth trajectory. If your growth is steady and predictable, it might not meet the thresholds required for venture funding. Consider the following example: revenue grows from $0.5 million to $1 million to $1.7 million to $2.5 million to $3.5 million over five years, with an annual growth rate of $0.7 million. While this is commendable, it may not be enough to attract venture capitalists, who often seek rapid, exponential growth.

In such cases, altering your growth plan to meet their expectations can be detrimental. If your natural growth pace doesn't align with their requirements, it becomes a struggle. This is especially true if you're not planning to exit at a high valuation, which could lead to financial losses for both founders and investors.

Control and Ownership

Securing venture funding requires giving up a significant level of control. Once you accept external investment, your ownership percentages and decision-making power will be compromised. For instance, Travis Kalanick's experience at Uber illustrates this point. Although he held voting control, external investors forced him out due to the company's financial struggles.

This is a crucial aspect of venture funding: investors demand a higher return on investment, often at the expense of the founders' control. If you are unwilling to relinquish control, venture funding might not be the right choice for your startup.

Exit Strategy and Return on Investment

Furthermore, venture funding significantly affects the exit strategy and financial returns. For a self-funded company that sells for $30 million with 80% ownership, the founders achieve a favorable outcome. However, with venture funding, achieving the same financial return may require an exit at a much higher valuation, such as $300 million. This translates to potentially less profit for both founders and investors.

Ultimately, the decision between bootstrapping and seeking venture funding depends on your startup's specific circumstances. Each path has its pros and cons, and it's crucial to carefully evaluate what is best for your business.

Read More About Bootstrapping and Venture Capital