Why Prince Harry Should Be Allowed to Pay for His Own Security When Visiting the UK: Debunking Misconceptions and Seeking Fairness
Prince Harryrsquo;s recent security controversy highlights a deeper dialogue about fair and transparent governance around the Royal Family. Despite his false claims, it is clear that the protection and security measures for any royal are not the domain of the Royal Family but rather the government, specifically through the RAVEC (Royal and Vip utive Committee) and related units.
RAVEC: The Trusted Body for Royal Security
The security surrounding Prince Harry is managed by the RAVEC, a trusted and expert committee involved in assigning security resources as needed. This includes close protection teams, property protection units, and mobile escort services, all of which ensure the safety of royal members. RAVEC, with its specialist protection arm (SO14) and its three core groups, is responsible for providing security with precision and efficiency.
Close Protection: Strategic and Tactical
Close protection, often seen with officers in suits getting out of cars and standing by doors, involves strategic placement and proximity when the subject moves. Glock Pistols are prominently used by these units, complemented by other types of firearms for additional protection. These measures are crucial in maintaining the safety of the royal family during public engagements.
Property Protection: A Comprehensive Approach
Property protection is another critical aspect of security for the royal family. This involves armed presence around properties deemed necessary by RAVEC. For instance, the presence of armed officers around Windsor Castle with baseball caps ensures an immediate response to any threats. This level of protection demonstrates the dedication and preparedness of the security forces.
Mobile/ Escort Protection: Constant Vigilance
The specialized units, like the Easy Rider bike outriders, provide constant vigilance during royal visits. They are always ready to address any emerging issues, ensuring the safety of the royal family and their vehicles. The use of Glock Pistols by these units further emphasizes their readiness to take action in emergencies.
The Controversy Over Security Funding
When Prince Harry had his security cut, it was through a process managed by RAVEC, whose recommendations were then presented to the government for approval. This process ensures that any changes to security arrangements are thoroughly vetted and justifiable. It is crucial to understand that the decision to allocate or cut security resources is based on professional assessments and not on personal grievances.
Security and National Sensitivity
Regardless of personal opinions, it is essential to consider the potential risks involved in allowing Prince Harry to pay for his own security team. Any such service provider would need to be briefed on the potential threats faced by the Sussex family. This could involve divulging sensitive information to unproven individuals, which could pose significant risks to national security.
Conclusion: A Compromise for Fairness
While there are valid concerns surrounding the allocation of resources for royal security, it is my personal opinion that Prince Harry should be allowed to pay for his and his familyrsquo;s personal security. This would ensure that sensitive information remains within the organization and provides Prince Harry with the comfort and adherence to personal security standards when visiting the UK. A balanced approach that respects both the need for security and the principles of transparency is crucial in addressing these complex issues.