Why King George VI Decided to Keep His Daughters in England During World War II
During the tumultuous period of World War II, King George VI and Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother faced a daunting decision regarding the safety of their daughters, Princess Elizabeth and Princess Margaret. The history of this period is marked by decisions that reflect a balance between the desire to keep the princesses safe and the need to stand with the British people during a perilous time. This article will explore the myriad factors that influenced the royal family's choice to remain in England and the impact of their decision.
Public Sentiment and Symbolism
The decision to keep Princess Elizabeth and Princess Margaret in England was not made in isolation but was deeply rooted in the public sentiment and symbolism of the time. The royal family believed that remaining in the United Kingdom during the war would serve as a powerful solidarity symbol to the British people. The presence of the crown within the nation demonstrated that the monarchy was not abandoning their subjects in times of strife.
As stated famously by Queen Elizabeth II, the Queen's grandmother, 'The Princesses will not leave without me, I will not leave without the King, and the King will never leave.' This sentiment encapsulates the familial unity that was so essential during wartime. Remaining in London, especially during the Blitz, helped to maintain a sense of normalcy and togetherness. Queen Elizabeth II's remark, after Buckingham Palace was bombed, 'I could look the East Enders in the eye,' underscores the deep connection the royal family had with the British people.
Security Risks and Challenges
While the royal family's presence in the UK was a powerful message, there were also significant security concerns that influenced their decision. The risks of transporting the princesses to Canada or other safer locations were substantial. There were worries about the security and accessibility during the journey. Moreover, the British government believed that the royal family's security was better ensured by their proximity to governmental protection and resources in London.
The logistical challenges and potential risks of relocation, including the hazards of air travel and the uncertainties of wartime travel, were difficult to mitigate. These factors led the royal family to weigh the benefits of proximity to their populace against the increased security risks involved in relocation. The decision to stay in England thus aimed to strike a balance between safety and public visibility.
Family Unity and Public Engagement
The choice to remain in London was also driven by the royal family's desire to maintain family unity. During the war, Princess Elizabeth took on more public duties, including volunteering with the Auxiliary Territorial Service. This involvement not only helped to boost morale but also demonstrated the royal family's commitment to the war effort. The princesses' public presence was a source of comfort and inspiration to the British people.
The family living together during the Blitz was a symbol of resilience and togetherness. It was a time when the British people needed reassurance and hope, and the family's presence provided a sense of continuity. The royal family's commitment to remaining together during such turbulent times reinforced their image as a unit that would weather any storm together.
In conclusion, the decision to keep Princess Elizabeth and Princess Margaret in England during World War II was a complex one, influenced by public sentiment, security risks, and the importance of family unity and public engagement. The royal family's presence in London during a time of crisis was a powerful symbol of solidarity and the bond between the monarchy and the British people. Their story remains an enduring testament to the resilience and courage displayed by the British royal family during one of the most challenging periods in the nation's history.