Why Is the Prosecution of Trump Taking So Long?
Often, impatience is the foremost emotion when considering the prolonged legal process against former President Trump. Why does it take so long to bring him to justice? Is it because the case is complex, or are there other underlying factors? This article explores these questions from a typical American's perspective, shedding light on the legal process, the justice system, and the taxpayer's involvement.
A Personal Perspective from Juror Experience
A firsthand account of a juror's experience in a double-murder case provides context. The case, involving a drug gang with multiple repeat offenders, was a straightforward matter where the defendant was found guilty and sentenced to multiple life terms. However, the murder occurred almost three years ago. This discrepancy raises the question of why it takes such a long time to resolve cases, especially when the evidence is substantial.
The volume of evidence in the case against Donald Trump is comparable to the task of cleaning one's fat rolls; it will take considerable time. This long process is a testament to the thoroughness required in legal proceedings, ensuring that justice is done.
Two-Tier Justice System
The argument about a two-tier justice system, where the wealthy have more privileges, is pivotal. The wealthy, like Trump, can afford top-tier legal representation. These lawyers can prolong the legal process, thereby making it more difficult to bring former presidents to justice quickly.
Taking into account the two-tier justice system, it becomes evident that the legal process against a figure like Trump is more complex due to his wealth and the power of his political base. The fact that the American legal system has not previously faced a former president with the same criminal charges adds another layer of complexity to the case.
The Subjugation of Truth
The protection of the truth, especially in the political arena, has become a significant issue. Trump's supporters are more interested in being part of his cult than in the truth. This subjugation of the truth is evident in events like the January 6th insurrection, where the support for Trump was unwavering despite overwhelming evidence of wrongdoing.
Political Retaliation and Rule of Law
The threat of political retaliation from Republicans is a serious concern. If Trump's involvement is indeed discovered, it raises the question of whether the US remains a nation under the rule of law. The arrests and accusations against politicians from other parties, such as Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert, and the censure of Adam Schiff, highlight this tension.
Historical Precedents and the Risk of Pardons
Nixon's case, with the potential pardon for the collective good, serves as an example of how such a decision can have dire consequences. The pardoning of a former president who committed grave crimes, as exemplified by Nixon's actions, can set a dangerous precedent. It is crucial that the justice process moves faster when the accused confesses to the offenses in public, as in Trump's case.
Conclusion
The length of time it takes to bring a former president like Donald Trump to justice is not accidental. It highlights the complex interplay between the justice system, the political climate, and the broader implications for the rule of law. Understanding these factors is crucial for anyone seeking to grasp the nuances of the situation and the ongoing legal process.
Keywords: prosecute, Trump, legal process, justice system, taxpayer's perspective