The True Intent Behind Ajit Pai's Ambitions to Repeal Net Neutrality Rules
When the question of whether Ajit Pai believes in removing current net neutrality rules was asked in 2017, the landscape of internet regulation was much different than it is today. The reality is that both Ajit Pai and the FCC's actions in 2015 have left a lasting impact. Despite his past affiliations and the repeal of net neutrality rules, the internet remains neutral in the United States today. This article delves into Ajit Pai's background and the true intent behind his repeal efforts, exploring the political and economic factors at play.
Background and Repeal Efforts
Before Ajit Pai's tenure at the FCC, he was a prominent lobbyist for telecommunications companies including Verizon. His work for these corporations influenced his perspective and undoubtedly shaped his regulatory philosophy. As a libertarian, Pai may have preferred a less restrictive Internet, but the reality is that the repeal of net neutrality rules was aimed at giving big broadband providers greater control over the internet.
The 2015 Open Internet Order
The 2015 Open Internet Order is a crucial document that established the framework for net neutrality. For those interested in the nuances of Pai's dissent, a detailed PDF of this order can be found at https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-15-24A1.pdf. Saturdays, while dissenting, provided a rational and nuanced argument. Readers can scroll to page 321 of the 400-page document to see Pai's full dissenting opinion and its supporting citations. Additionally, Michael O'Reilly's dissent can be found on page 385. While the dissent may not match the public perception, it offers valuable insights into the complexity of the issue.
Mixed Feelings on the Open Internet Order
While the 2015 Open Internet Order provided a framework for net neutrality, some argue it also created room for potential loopholes. Over time, these regulations could have grown more complex and cumbersome. Personally, I have mixed feelings about the Open Internet Order. It was beneficial for my employer, but also seemed to create a slippery slope with potential for abuse. As time went on, it may have become more onerous to manage, leading to calls for reform.
The Political and Economic Factors
The political and economic factors at play in the repeal of net neutrality rules are deeply intertwined. Broadband providers, who stand to gain from increased control, have long lobbied for tighter regulatory control. Their desire for increased control is rooted in the understanding that the internet is a money-making machine and a valuable resource for information leaks. The repeal of net neutrality rules was never about restoring and improving the internet; it was an unprecedented giveaway to these powerful corporations.
Repeal as an Unprecedented Giveaway
The repeal of net neutrality rules was seen as an effort to benefit big broadband providers and their investors. The stock market would likely see a surge in these companies' shares, allowing them to extract tolls from businesses and consumers. These common carriers would now be classified as Information Services, creating the potential for paid prioritization and traffic control. The result would be a situation where ISPs could block or slow down traffic, and prioritize certain online applications and services based on payment.
The implications of this plan are clear: it is not about the common good. It is about benefiting the most powerful people in the country and those who can afford to bid the highest. As such, it is up to citizens to vigilantly monitor and oppose these changes. If you believe in an open and accessible internet, you should be as concerned now as ever.