The IRS and Trump's Tax Returns: Debunking the Conspiracy
There is a pervasive view among some segments of the internet that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) should conduct a more thorough audit of former President Donald Trump's tax returns. However, the reality is that these returns have been subject to intense scrutiny for years, and there is substantial evidence indicating that any claims of discrepancy or impropriety have been either misinformed or unfounded.
Why the IRS Has Already Conducted Thorough Reviews
It's important to recognize that the IRS has not just idly stared at Trump's tax returns; they have meticulously examined them for years. Both members of the Democratic Party and the House of Representatives have been actively involved in this process, scrutinizing every detail. These returns have been examined with the same level of scrutiny that would be applied to documents of paramount national security importance.
The notion that the IRS has not thoroughly investigated Trump's returns is simply a mischaracterization. The Democrats themselves, having full authority and access, have conducted extensive reviews. When you compare the level of scrutiny given to the tax returns of other public figures or corporations, it's clear that Trump's returns have been subjected to an unparalleled level of examination.
Why Trump Resisted Releasing the Returns
Trump's reluctance to release his tax returns was not an attempt to disguise potential wrongdoing. Rather, it was a strategic move to avoid influencing the ongoing audit process. Releasing the returns prematurely could have biased the auditors, leading to a skewed or biased investigation.
A thorough audit of billionaire tax returns, taking into account the complexity of such records, can indeed take years. During the years following the 2016 election, the IRS and other relevant agencies conducted an exhaustive examination. This process would naturally involve rigorous and time-consuming scrutiny, making it a lengthy undertaking.
The Claims of No Finding and the Reality
One common assertion is that there was nothing significant found in these years of scrutiny. However, the lack of finding substantial discrepancies or evidence of impropriety does not mean there is nothing to investigate. Over six years, hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars were allocated to this scrutiny, and it's important to consider the outcomes of these efforts.
The fact that no significant findings have emerged does not necessarily mean that everything is in order. It could simply be that the scrutiny was thorough, and no impropriety was found. Alternatively, what was found was consistent with what had already been reported.
The Question of Evidence and Trust
The current political climate is characterized by a polarized belief system where one side firmly believes in conspiracy theories and the other finds such assertions baseless. It's essential to consider the overwhelming evidence and the extensive investigative efforts that have been carried out. The lack of concrete proof aligns more closely with professional investigative findings rather than unverified rumors.
The claim that evidence of Joe Biden's incompetence and illegal activities has emerged is a tactic to shift focus away from the original issue. These claims lack substantial backing and often appear to be attempts to discredit the political process itself.
Given the vast resources and expertise involved in the scrutiny of Trump's tax returns, it is prudent to trust the official investigative process. Releasing the returns may have complicated this process, but it does not change the fact that the returns have been thoroughly and professionally examined.
In conclusion, the scrutiny of Trump's tax returns has been extensive, lengthy, and conducted by highly trained professionals. The lack of significant findings does not mean the process was lacking, but rather that it was thorough and professional in its execution.