The Controversial Legacy of Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran

The Controversial Legacy of Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran

As an Iranian Muslim, I often find myself reflecting on the complex legacy of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, a figure whose influence continues to shape the Iranian political landscape. Even today, Khomeini is a polarizing figure among the Iranian population. His influence as a mystic and cleric remains strong within Shia seminaries, but his tenure as a statesman and politician carries a more contentious legacy due to the controversial notion of vilayat-e faqih.

While the majority of Shia Muslims still revere Khomeini, it is important to note that other religious sects and their followers, including Iranian atheists, Bahais, and Christians, tend to either dislike or even hate him. This divergence in opinions reflects the multifaceted and divisive nature of his legacy.

The Ruination of Good Memories

Ayatollah Khomeini belongs to the past, and the current regime’s actions, particularly those of Ali Khamenei, have doing little to restore positive memories of Khomeini among the Iranian populace. Additionally, it is widely known that Khomeini’s rise to power was orchestrated by the British to maintain their influence in Iran, a historical fact that further tarnishes his reputation.

Public Sentiment on the Current Government

The current Iranian government is often viewed with a mix of apathy and resigned pragmatism. Many Iranians do not particularly like their government, but they see it as the lesser of two evils. This sentiment is not unique to Iran; it reflects a universal attitude among those who live under authoritarian regimes.

It is important to understand that the coup of 1953, orchestrated by the United States, taught Iranians that democracy is too fragile and susceptible to foreign manipulation. Iranians have had to reconcile with the idea that if they cannot have domestic tyranny, they must endure foreign tyranny instead.

The Role of the Ayatollahs

For some educated urban Iranians, the Ayatollahs might be viewed as medieval figures, but there is also a begrudging respect for their role in safeguarding Iranian national sovereignty. By resisting superpowers, the Ayatollahs afford the country a degree of autonomy that is rare in today's world.

The Importance of Sovereignty

Sovereignty, the right of a nation to self-determination, is far more significant than democracy. A country that can make its own decisions without external interference is a rare and precious entity. While the Ayatollahs might be seen as bizarre or even crazy by some, they stand up to those who would undermine Iran’s sovereignty.

The Alternatives

If one were to seek a replacement for these Ayatollahs, the alternatives would likely be even more deranged individuals with no inclination to resist foreign powers. The Ayatollahs, despite their perceived eccentricities, represent a critical bulwark against foreign domination.

In conclusion, while Ayatollah Khomeini's legacy is complex and polarized, the protection of Iranian sovereignty and the courage to stand against foreign powers remain critical aspects of his enduring influence.