Reflections on 'The American Royal Baby' Special on ABC News: A Deal Gone Awry?
What did you think of the ABC news special The American Royal Baby? In this article, I explore my thoughts on whether the special truly aligns with the historical conflicts and modern ideals of both the U.S. and U.K.
The Historical Contradiction
It is a contradiction in terms, especially given the history of the United States. The American Revolutionary War and the War of Independence were fought against Britain to create clear political and cultural separation. The United States was born as a country distinct from the British monarchy and royal family.
Despite the fact that this royal baby is American, her status as a member of the British aristocracy and her marriage to someone in the 6th line of succession to the British throne introduce a conflict of interest. This conflict is rooted in the historical tension between the two nations.
A Matter of Incomplete Belonging?
Her regal title, while present, does not translate to a royal life as she would experience had she remained in the United Kingdom. This is a farce—a mere simulacrum of what royal life should be. It is a royal life 'American style,' and I find it tacky for not taking itself seriously. It feels like a mockery of tradition.
The American Dream vs. Royal Duty
The American Dream is about pursuing one's own desire and fulfillment, whereas the role of a royal in a constitutional monarchy is to serve the public interest, enabling others to realize their dreams. These contrasting focuses highlight the situation as self-serving and self-centered.
Henry, the father, seems to desire all the privileges of royalty without the responsibilities. A commoner can make decisions about their own life, but public servants like royals are accountable to others. This accountablility is part of the structure that keeps the institution functioning for the greater good.
The Drawbacks of Holding Both Titles
There is an inherent contradiction in trying to maintain both an American and a royal identity. While some may appreciate the hybrid status, others find it incongruent with traditional boundaries. Henry's position allows him to keep the benefits of royal titles while avoiding the obligations, much to the chagrin of many.
One must wonder why this deal was made in the first place. It seems that the pursuit of media attention and financial gain by those involved makes the situation even more questionable. The primary goal appears to be serving the interests of the media rather than the public interest.
Conclusion and Final Thoughts
My opinion or statements are just that—my own. I share this perspective openly, and others are free to offer their own views. The debate over the appropriateness of this special and its implications for both nations is ongoing, and the public is encouraged to engage in meaningful discussions informed by historical context and cultural values.
Do you have an opposing view? Share it in the comments.
Disclaimer: I have disabled comments because I know even before posting there will be people to disagree with me. My opinion or statements are just that - mine. People are free to disagree if they have a different experience. If you have an opposing view, please feel free to add it as an answer yourself.