Psychology and Political Science: The Interconnected Nature of Human Thoughts and Actions

Psychology and political science are two disciplines that, at first glance, might seem far removed from one another. However, a closer examination reveals a strong and interconnected relationship, especially when considering the role of human behavior in shaping political systems and interactions. This article will explore the relevance of psychology in political science, drawing from the pioneering works of scholars like Harold Lasswell, as well as detailed analyses of complex human thought patterns.

The Role of Psychology in Political Science

Political science is fundamentally concerned with the relationships and interactions among individuals and groups. This field seeks to understand how people are governed and how they govern themselves. However, to fully comprehend these interactions, one must consider the psychological foundations that underpin human behavior. Human beings are not simply rational animals; they are also emotional, social, and often irrational. These psychological factors significantly influence political decisions and outcomes. Harold Lasswell's Influence on Understanding Political Science
One of the most influential contributors to this understanding is political scientist Harold Lasswell. Lasswell's work is encapsulated in his famous formula, "who gets what when and how" (Lasswell, 1948). This simple yet profound formula underscores the importance of psychological processes in shaping political behaviors. It suggests that to truly understand politics, one must examine the motivations and behaviors of individuals and groups. In essence, Lasswell's work highlights the psychological aspects that drive political processes.

The Left and Right Brain in Politics

When it comes to political thought, the division of the brain into left and right becomes particularly relevant. Traditional wisdom might suggest that the left brain governs logical, rational thought, while the right brain dominates emotional, irrational thought. However, this dichotomy is not as clear-cut as it may appear.

Harold Lasswell's political science studies reveal the complexity of political thought, where both sides of the brain play a role in shaping ideologies. For example, EGMi's Maximization of the Left Brain proposes that the left brain is associated with logical, positive thought, potentially leading to utopian visions, while the right brain, driven by anxiety and negative emotions, might fuel extremist ideologies. This understanding is not absolute; it acknowledges the multifaceted nature of political thought.

Case Study: EGMi and Political Thought

EGMi, a controversial theory, aims to maximize the use of the left brain, promoting logical and rational decision-making. According to this perspective, the left brain helps achieve greater goodness and happiness through the use of intelligence (IQ). EGMi argues that if everyone used their left brains to the fullest extent, it could lead to a utopian society. In contrast, the right brain might drive anxiety and negative emotions, leading to more extreme or irrational political ideologies. This division is not a global rule but rather an exploration of how different parts of the brain influence political thought.

The Developments of Human Behavior Over Time

Psychology studies human behavior across different stages of life and within various social systems. It aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how individuals develop and adapt to their environments. From the family to the international level, the interplay of social systems shapes human behavior profoundly.

The study of Adam Smith's contributions to both psychology and politics highlights the interconnectedness of these fields. Smith's work on human nature has been foundational, yet modern psychology seems to have deviated from his path. Lasswell's critique of contemporary psychology suggests that it lacks the depth and insight to understand and address the complexities of human behavior.

Concluding Thoughts

In conclusion, psychology and political science are deeply intertwined. The behavior of individuals and groups, as analyzed through psychological lenses, plays a critical role in shaping political systems and outcomes. By recognizing the psychological foundations of political thought and action, we can better understand and navigate the complexities of human interactions and dynamics.

References: Lasswell, H. (1948). Politics: Who Gets What, When, How?. Yale University Press. [1] Harold Lasswell's Influence [2] EGMi's Maximization of the Left Brain