Exploring Plot Holes in Limitless: A Closer Look at Money and Intelligence

I saw Limitless a decade ago, and recently a question popped up in my mind that I hadn't given much thought to before. The scene where Eddie Norris, played by Bradley Cooper, owes a Russian loan shark a significant sum of money, including the interest, remains a gnawing plot hole that piqued my curiosity.

How Much did Eddie Owe?

When viewing the film, the precise amount Eddie owed is left ambiguous. However, an analysis of the movie reveals that the exact amount may not be as critical to the plot as the consequence of failing to pay the debt. It was only after a brief mental exercise that I realized the plot hole: Eddie, a man of newly enhanced intelligence and infinite wealth, had no apparent means to locate the loan shark.

Considering Eddie's unique traits and his enhanced genius, it is plausible that the means to find the loan shark were more complex. The writer cleverly created this plot hole to drive the action climax, hence the solution wasn’t immediately obvious, even to me. The cleverness in handling the plot closure is another aspect that makes the film underrated by critics.

A Film That Taps into Human Nature

Limitless raises questions about human behavior, specifically whether a person with infinite intelligence and resources would take responsibility for their debts. Undoubtedly, the film implicitly suggests that the character of Eddie, as well as any other basic male adult, would put their own needs and desires before paying off a debt. This complex character dynamic adds depth to the narrative.

The film excels in creating suspense and intrigue, leaving viewers to ponder the implications of Eddie's actions. The writer’s choice to skip the tedious details and cut to the eventual outcome enhances the overall narrative and keeps the audience engaged.

World War Z and the Sound of Silence

Now let's shift to the logic in World War Z, where Brad Pitt's character discovers that the infected are attracted to sound. In a situation where the infected are targeting the lab containing pathogens, wouldn't it make more strategic sense for the characters to go to a second floor window and make a racket, drawing the infected away from the lab? This act of creating noise could serve as a diversionary tactic, potentially saving the lives of those inside the lab.

The Logic Behind the Characters' Actions

Given the dire situation, the characters' actions are understandable. In a scenario involving survival, taking calculated risks is a natural response. However, the question remains whether a more strategic approach would serve the plot better. Making noise and drawing the infected away can be seen as a strategic decision that adds depth to the narrative. It would also provide a moment of cleverness and problem-solving, which could enhance the overall experience for the audience.

Final Thoughts

Both Limitless and World War Z are films that explore the limits of human intelligence and the instinct for survival. These plot holes, while perhaps serving a larger narrative purpose, open up room for discussion and analysis. They are examples of how writers and directors navigate the fine line between plot coherence and engaging storytelling.

Do you have any other questions or thoughts about the logic in these films? Feel free to share in the comments below, and don't forget to explore more of these fascinating narratives on your own!