Has Jordan Violated Their 1994 Peace Agreement with Israel?

No, not yet. However, the actions of King Abdullah II have placed Jordan in a delicate position. While Jordan has not officially violated the 1994 Peace Treaty, it has certainly encroached on the spirit of peace that the agreement was designed to uphold. The kingdom's recent actions, especially involving the Waqf and the struggle for Jerusalem, have raised concerns over its commitment to the peace treaty.

King Abdullah II's Position and Responsibilities

King Abdullah II has maintained a difficult balance, particularly in light of his role as the custodian of the Islamic Waqf. While it is true that his actions may somewhat undermine the spirit of the peace treaty, it is essential to consider his responsibilities as the highest authority governing this trust. This position has allowed Jordan to play a critical role in the religious and cultural aspects of Jerusalem, which is seen by many as a significant factor in the ongoing disputes.

Role of the Waqf and Its Impact on the Peace Treaty

The Islamic Waqf, as the paymaster, has been actively involved in efforts to assert Jerusalem as the capital of the future Palestinian state. This involvement has not only been controversial but also potentially in violation of the spirit of the peace agreement. The Waqf has openly confronted not only Israel but also the Jerusalem municipality, leading to tensions and disputes. This behavior is problematic because it goes beyond the scope of Jordan's responsibilities as outlined in the peace treaty.

Threats and Violations of the Treaty

Jordan has threatened to nullify the 1994 Peace Treaty if Israel extends its civil law over parts of Judea and Samaria. This stance is particularly noteworthy as it implies that Jordan is not willing to accept Israeli control over these territories, which is a key clause in the peace agreement. The relevant paragraph in the agreement explicitly states that Jordan should not extend its lease over two small pieces of land along the border with Israel, a lease which was granted 25 years ago. This act is clearly against the spirit of the peace treaty and undermines the stability of the region.

Comparison with King Hussein's Stance

It appears that King Abdullah II's relationship with Israel is less friendly than that of his father, King Hussein, who signed the peace treaty in 1994. King Hussein was known for his diplomatic efforts and willingness to work towards a peaceful resolution. His son, while maintaining the legal framework of the peace treaty, seems to be taking a more assertive stance that may be perceived as disregarding the balance of power that was originally intended.

Conclusion

While Jordan has not officially violated the 1994 Peace Agreement with Israel, its actions, particularly those involving the Waqf and the stance towards Jerusalem, have certainly raised questions about its commitment to upholding the spirit of the agreement. It remains to be seen how these actions will affect the long-term stability of the region and whether Jordan will continue to play a constructive role in achieving peace.