Is the New World Order a Managerial Agenda Managing Two Economic Classes?

The concept of the New World Order (NWO) has been a topic of intense debate and speculation for decades. Some believe it represents a sinister plot to manage two distinct economic classes, while others dismiss it as a baseless fantasy. This article aims to explore the emerging theories, rhetorical devices, and historical context that fuel these debates.

The Rhetorical Device of the NWO

The term "New World Order" is often used as a rhetorical device, similar to phrases like "War on Terror." It is a catchall term that captures the public's fears and anxieties about a future where they might become marginalized or silenced by a powerful elite. However, the NWO, as it is commonly portrayed, is often a product of uninformed speculation by conspiracy theorists who believe in a global plot orchestrated by a shadowy entity.

Managerialism and Economic Class

Some argue that the NWO, if it exists, is more accurately characterized as a managerial agenda. This perspective suggests that there are two dominant economic classes: one, led by socialist-leaning consumers and the general population, and the other, those who control and hoard all the wealth of the world, primarily through international finance and capitalist banks. Interestingly, this view is not entirely baseless.

The Role of the Left

One significant aspect of the managerialist perspective is the emphasis on the role of the left and their control over global institutions. It is argued that the left, not the international finance capitalist banks, are the true architects of the global order. This view is compelling because many major global institutions, such as the UN, WTO, and IMF, have been significantly influenced by left-leaning ideologies. The left's agendas often reflect a desire for a more equal and regulated global economy.

The left's control over these institutions allows them to shape economic policies and social programs that cater to their vision of a more egalitarian world. For instance, programs that promote social welfare, redistribute wealth, and regulate industries are often championed by the left. While this can be seen as a positive force for the general public in terms of providing more equal opportunities, it can also be interpreted as a form of managerialism where the left is managing the economic class to fit their ideological framework.

A Historical Analysis of the NWO

The historical contexts surrounding the New World Order provide additional layers to this discussion. Several key historical events have been associated with the idea of the NWO:

The Birth of the New World Order

1. The Signing of the Declaration of Independence: Some view the period after the Declaration of Independence as a form of New World Order, emphasizing the rise of a unified, independent nation-state. This perspective posits that the new order was characterized by a shift from colonial rule to self-governance.

The Cold War Era

2. The End of the Cold War: With the end of the Cold War, the world witnessed a significant shift in global power dynamics. The United States emerged as the dominant superpower, leading to a more unipolar world order. The idea of a New World Order during this period was often associated with globalization and the expansion of Western influence.

The Antichrist and the Sign of the Beast

3. The End Times Prophesies: In eschatological contexts, the New World Order is often linked to apocalyptic visions, particularly those involving the Antichrist and the Sign of the Beast. These prophecies describe a future world where a powerful entity seeks to control all aspects of human life. While these ideas are not widely accepted by mainstream scholars, they are a source of fascination and fear for many.

Is Managerialism Marxist in Nature?

The question of whether managerialism is inherently Marxist is complex. Traditional Marxism, represented by figures like Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, advocated for a society where economic wealth is owned collectively, and the means of production are controlled by the working class. However, modern interpretations of Marxism have evolved, and the idea of egalitarianism has been replaced by a focus on centralized control and management of society.

The Evolution of Marxism

Modern forms of Marxism, especially those associated with the left, advocate for a centralized state that manages the economy and society to achieve greater equality. However, this modern version is often not embraced by the general public due to its association with authoritarianism and suppression of individual freedoms.

Conclusion

While the New World Order remains a contentious and often misunderstood concept, the managerialist agenda proposing two economic classes is a plausible interpretation. This perspective highlights the role of the left and their influence on global institutions, fostering a more regulated and equal world. Whether this is the true essence of the New World Order or just a convenient narrative, it is a debate that continues to unfold in the complex landscape of global politics and economics.