The Controversial Choice: Is Rex Tillerson the Right Secretary of State?
Rex Tillerson has been a significant figure in American politics, but his appointment as Secretary of State under the Trump administration has been met with mixed reactions. Critics argue that his lack of political experience and potential conflicts of interest make him an unqualified choice, while others defend his business acumen and foreign policy expertise. This article delves into the debate surrounding Rex Tillerson's suitability for the position and explores his effectiveness in the role.
Tillerson's Grading: An Unimpressive Score
From the perspective of an observer who has studied the careers of Secretaries of State for nearly four decades, Rex Tillerson receives a D- for effectiveness in the role. This grade is far higher than that of his boss, President Donald Trump. In recent events, Tillerson's apparent contradiction towards North Korea policy has further cast doubt on his capabilities. On one hand, he publicly advised against direct talks and sanctions, while on the other, Trump accepted a new invitation to speak with Kim Jong Un.
These conflicting statements raise significant questions about Tillerson's decision-making and the extent to which he serves as a genuine and effective Secretary of State in an administration known for its unpredictability.
A Lack of Political Experience
Much controversy surrounds Rex Tillerson's lack of political experience, marking him as the first Secretary of State in American history with no experience in politics. His background as a 40-year CEO of ExxonMobil raises concerns about his ability to navigate the complex world of foreign policy. The history of ExxonMobil and its role in climate change debates have further cast a shadow on his credentials.
Tillerson's history includes receiving the Order of Friendship from Vladimir Putin, which has raised questions about his allegiances and commitment to American interests. His past opposition to US sanctions on Russia indicates potential conflicts of interest and a lack of decisiveness in supporting American foreign policy goals.
Expert Versus Policy Advisor
One can argue that a successful CEO does not automatically make an effective Secretary of State. While business acumen and strategic thinking are valuable, the role of Secretary of State requires a deep understanding of international relations, diplomacy, and global politics. Tillerson's experience lacks this depth, leading to concerns about his effectiveness in the role.
Furthermore, the history of ExxonMobil's role in climate change debates highlights the importance of ethical and moral consideration in foreign policy. Tillerson's leadership during this period raises valid questions about his capability to prioritize American interests and uphold ethical standards.
Public Denunciation and Support
Given the mixed reactions, political figures such as John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and Marco Rubio have been urged to publicly denounce Tillerson. For example, dialing these senators to express concerns about Tillerson's candidacy can be a powerful way to influence decision-makers. A sample script for these calls is provided, emphasizing the need for political experience and the importance of ethical leadership.
Conclusion
The debate over Rex Tillerson's suitability for the position of Secretary of State highlights the ongoing tension between business and political acumen in the realm of foreign policy. While his experience with oil and gas industry may offer some strategic advantages, the lack of political experience and potential conflicts of interest underscore significant concerns about his effectiveness.
For those following the careers of Secretaries of State, the verdict on Rex Tillerson's effectiveness in the role raises important questions about the balance of experience and ethics in shaping American foreign policy.