Embezzlement: Forgiveness vs. Consequences

Embezzlement is often not a 'mistake' or a poor judgment, but a deliberate act of stealing funds that falls under the realm of theft and crime. The severity and consequences of embezzlement can be significant, impacting not only the financial well-being of the victim but also the perpetrator's future.

How Forgivable is Embezzlement?

Embezzlement is rarely considered forgivable in a legal context. In the United States, 'embezzlement' is not a crime that can be mitigated by forgiveness. Whether your actions are sandwiched between a moment of extreme stress or an act of desperation, they still fall under the category of criminal behavior. Without the legal support of forgiveness, a convicted embezzler will face severe legal consequences.

The concept of forgiveness comes into play from the victim's standpoint. For example, if a family of a murdered person openly forgives a convicted murderer in court, this gesture does not relieve the murderer of their legal obligations and does not prevent a prison sentence. Similarly, forgiveness from an employer does not equate to legal immunity for an employee who has committed embezzlement. If the stolen amount is significant (above $400 is typically considered a felony), the consequences could include arrest, trial, and potential imprisonment.

From a legal perspective, the decision to forgive does not alter the facts—there is no legal mechanism for forgiveness that releases one from the obligation of facing the criminal justice system. If you are fired from a job for embezzling funds, it is likely your employer will report the incident to local law enforcement. The severity of the charges depends on the amount stolen, and regardless of forgiveness, the perpetrator could face serious legal repercussions.

Forgiveness: Psychological vs. Legal Perspectives

From a personal or psychological perspective: forgiveness is a deeply personal choice. It is about the person whose trust was violated granting themselves permission to let go of resentment or malice. For the individual who committed embezzlement, forgiveness offered by the victim can provide some level of emotional release but does not change the legal landscape.

The Decision to Forgive in Corporate Settings

Some companies choose not to press charges against embezzlers, especially if the incident is the result of an employee's hardship or misfortune. The reasoning behind this might be to avoid public scrutiny and potential negative publicity. However, this approach is not a substitute for facing the criminal justice system, as it does not address the legal wrong committed.

The ethical and moral aspects of embezzlement transcend legal definitions. Personal trust can be severely damaged by the act of embezzlement, and the person who has been violated may choose to forgive, but this does not alter their legal rights or obligations.

Consequences of Embezzlement

No matter the circumstances, the consequences of embezzlement are severe:

Arrest and prosecution: If the stolen amount is significant, legal action is likely. Imprisonment: Conviction can result in a prison sentence. Financial restitution: The perpetrator must repay the stolen funds, often at three times the amount in cases involving corrupt officials. Professional repercussions: Once the crime is discovered, the embezzler may face termination, legal actions, and potential career damage. Legal and ethical harm: The act can severely damage professional and personal relationships.

Ultimately, the concept of forgiveness remains a personal choice, while the legal consequences of embezzlement are clear and unyielding. For those who have experienced embezzlement, it is crucial to understand the legal framework and seek appropriate remedies and support.