The Paradox of Conservative Communism

Most communist and quasi-communist regimes have traditionally embraced some form of conservatism, as the model inherently requires a degree of conformity. The very essence of communism is built on the idea of collective ownership and the suppression of individualism, which intrinsically aligns with conservative principles. However, the idea of a conservative communist is a combination that is as nonsensical as it is amusing, and perhaps even laughable.

A Humorous Observance of Individualist–Communist Non-Sense

Individualists, often characterized by their fierce independence and rebellious spirit, can find themselves drawn to the allure of communism. However, the fundamental principles of communism, which often involve the suppression of individual expression and the prioritization of collective harmony, are fundamentally at odds with the emphasis on personal freedom that defines these individualists. The juxtaposition of such opposing ideals is inherently comedic and often causes amusement.

The Impossibility of a Conservative Communist

Communism itself is a political and economic system where the government owns the entire economy and there is no private property. This complete eradication of individual ownership and the absence of any semblance of personal freedom make it impossible for the concept of a conservative communist to exist in any meaningful way. The notion is as amusing as it is nonsensical.

It is worth noting that in Western European countries, as well as in some of the more economically prosperous regions of Asia and Canada, there is a vibrant capitalist economy coupled with a form of democratic socialism or social democracy. These nations have democratic governments that provide their citizens with essential social benefits such as universal healthcare, subsidized technology and higher education, support for families with child care needs, universal retirement and nursing care, and generous retirement incomes. These countries consistently rank among the happiest in the world.

Examples from Europe and Canada

A perfect example is the story of my friends who started their own company— a children’s entertainment center—in France. They are undoubtedly capitalists but benefit from the same social supports that are available to their fellow citizens. This demonstrates that a successful business can thrive in an environment where there are also robust social democratic policies in place. While citizens of these countries may pay higher taxes, the benefits they receive, such as free healthcare, education, and retirement support, often offset these costs, sometimes even reducing their overall financial burden.

Comparison with Other Social Democratic Nations

In comparison, communist regimes like those in the former Soviet Union, North Korea, and Cuba have often led to widespread poverty and human rights abuses. The absence of individual rights and the sham of elections in these regimes have resulted in a complete loss of individual dignity and freedom. Such outcomes make the idea of a conservative communist even more unfathomable in contemporary times.

Modern Political and Economic Reforms

The United States under Barack Obama's presidency made some important reforms that moved in the direction of social democracy. Recent efforts and policies under President Biden continue along this pathway. Despite representing Delaware, one of the most business-oriented states in the United States, Biden is not portrayed as a socialist or a communist. His political ideology and actions adhere to a more centered approach that aims for a balance between capitalist and democratic socialist principles.

Conclusion

Opting for perfection in governance is unrealistic. Instead, voters should consider practical, feasible, and decent alternatives, such as social democracy. It is important to acknowledge the differences between socialism and communism and to vote for the policies that best serve the needs and aspirations of the community.

Voting Decent, Please