Overview of Computer Science Journals with Short Reviewing Periods
The reviewing period for scientific journals can vary significantly depending on a multitude of factors. From the policies of the journal to the field of study and the volume of submissions, these elements collectively influence the duration of the review process. However, certain computer science journals are recognized for their faster review times, which can be advantageous for researchers and authors looking to publish their work in a timely manner.
Notable Journals with Relatively Short Review Times
Here are some prominent computer science journals known for their efficient review processes:
1. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)
Although the review time can still be several months, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) is often highlighted for its efforts in maintaining a swift review process. This journal plays a crucial role in disseminating high-quality research, especially in the visualization and graphics domain.
2. IEEE Transactions on Computers
IEEE Transactions on Computers has gained a reputation for a relatively fast turnaround time. However, the duration can still extend to several months, depending on the nature of the submission. Despite this, the journal is known for its diligent and time-sensitive review processes.
3. Journal of Systems and Software
An important player in the software engineering field, the Journal of Systems and Software is recognized for its reasonably quick review process. This journal aims to provide timely feedback to authors, ensuring that the dissemination of research is efficient and effective.
4. Computers Security
For research in cybersecurity and defense mechanisms, Computers Security often has shorter review cycles, particularly for papers that align well with its scope. This journal is dedicated to advancing the state of knowledge in the field of computer security.
5. Frontiers in Computer Science
Due to its open-access model and editorial efficiency, Frontiers in Computer Science is known for its faster review process. This journal not only prioritizes the timely publication of research but also aims to make it accessible to the global academic community.
6. PLOS ONE
Although not exclusively a computer science journal, PLOS ONE is known for its quick review times. This open-access journal publishes a wide range of research across various fields, ensuring a rapid dissemination of scientific findings.
Personal Experience and Insights
My last experience with a journal from first submission to publication took 1.5 years, with only two minor reviews. This highlights the complexity of the review process, especially when dealing with intricate code or problems. Even highly polished and well-structured work can take a long time to be reviewed.
My advice is to choose the best journal that aligns with your research. Publishing in a less reputable journal solely to avoid a longer review might not be the wisest decision. It is essential to consider the long-term impact and the credibility of the journal when making your decision.
General Observations
There are many journals whose average first decision review time is between 8 to 12 weeks. These delays are mainly due to the peer review process, which requires significant time for expert review.
From my personal experience, Elsevier journals have been more 'honest' and less biased compared to IEEE. If you are unsure about the right journal for your research, Elsevier's Journal Finder can help you identify the most suitable journal. This resource can guide you towards journals that align with your work's domain and quality standards.
Conclusion
Choosing the right journal for your research is a critical decision. While the reviewing period can vary, selecting a journal based on its efficiency can significantly impact your publication process. By considering factors such as the journal's policies, field of study, and review process, you can make an informed decision that benefits your research and career.