Benefits and Drawbacks of Living in a Low Population Density Country in Europe: A Case Study of Finland and Iceland
Living in a low population density country in Europe can offer unique advantages and drawbacks. This article focuses on two such countries: Finland and Iceland. Both countries provide a stark contrast to densely populated urban environments and offer a lifestyle that emphasizes nature, community, and quality of life. However, there are also significant challenges that potential residents might face.
Benefits of Low Population Density Living in Finland and Iceland
Natural Beauty and Environmental Friendliness: Finland and Iceland are renowned for their breathtaking landscapes and pristine natural environments. In Finland, the vast forests, lakes, and tundra offer endless opportunities for outdoor activities, such as hiking, cycling, and fishing. Iceland, on the other hand, boasts stunning volcanoes, geysers, glaciers, and Northern Lights, creating a surreal and awe-inspiring landscape.
Clean and Safe Environment: Both countries are known for their commitment to maintaining clean and hygienic living conditions. Finland, for instance, is continually ranked among the cleanest countries globally, ensuring that its residents enjoy a high standard of living. Similarly, Iceland has stringent regulations to protect its unique ecosystems, resulting in a very clean and almost untouched environment.
High-Quality Education: Finland is often cited as one of the world's best educational systems, a fact that has garnered international attention. The country emphasizes an innovative and child-centered approach to learning, with a focus on developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills. While Iceland's education system is not quite as renowned, it still provides high-quality education across all levels, from primary to tertiary education.
Economic Stability and Lack of Corruption: Both Finland and Iceland are known for their stable and transparent economies. With a relatively low level of corruption and a strong focus on inclusivity and transparency, these countries offer a secure environment for both residents and businesses.
Drawbacks of Living in Low Population Density Countries: Finland and Iceland
Seasonal Challenges: The most significant drawback for potential residents is the long and cold winter season. In Finland, winters can last up to nine months and are characterized by extremely low temperatures and short daylight hours. This can lead to seasonal affective disorder (SAD) for some individuals, impacting their mental health and overall well-being.
Cost of Living and Specific Expenses: Certain items, like alcohol, can be very expensive in these countries due to high taxes and regulations. For example, in Finland, strong alcohol is particularly costly, which can be a significant financial burden for those who enjoy social drinking.
Conclusion
The decision to live in a low population density country like Finland or Iceland is a trade-off between benefits and drawbacks. While these countries offer a high quality of life, economic stability, and a strong emphasis on community and education, they also come with challenges such as long, cold winters and high costs of certain essentials. Potential residents should carefully consider these factors before making a decision.