Are 'Blood Diamonds' Still Prevalent in Western Africa?
When the term 'blood diamonds' was first coined, it referred to diamonds smuggled out of mines under inhumane conditions. Despite significant progress in the industry, the question of whether these unethical practices still exist in Western Africa remains pertinent. This article delves into the current status of blood diamonds and how the Kimberley Process has impacted the industry.
The Impact of the Blood Diamonds Movie
The 2006 film 'Blood Diamonds' brought widespread attention to the unethical practices in the diamond industry. Following the movie's release, stringent standards were implemented to prevent illicit trade. However, despite these measures, blood diamonds still exist, albeit in smaller numbers compared to before. The movie's portrayal of the industry's dark side has led to a lasting stigma, perpetuating the idea that these unethical practices are still prevalent.
Current Status of Blood Diamonds in Western Africa
According to Bruce, the percentage of blood diamonds has significantly decreased but still exists. The term 'conflict diamonds,' or 'blood diamonds,' refers to rough diamonds mined in conflict zones, used to fund rebel movements and militia groups seeking to overthrow governments. However, the Kimberley Process has effectively curbed these practices. Since its inception in 2003, the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme has ensured that diamonds do not fund violence.
The Kimberley Process: A Step Towards Ethical Trade
The Kimberley Process is an international initiative designed to prevent the flow of conflict diamonds into the mainstream rough diamond market. This scheme was established in May 2000 during a meeting of African diamond-producing states in Kimberley, South Africa. The primary goal was to stop the trade of conflict diamonds and ensure that diamond purchases were not financing acts of violence.
The Kimberley Process involves governments, industries, and civil society. Participating countries must implement legislation and regulations to control the trade of rough diamonds. They must also issue export and import certificates to ensure the diamonds they export and import comply with the scheme's standards. These measures have proven effective, significantly reducing the prevalence of blood diamonds.
Myth Busting: Common Misconceptions About Blood Diamonds
Contrary to popular belief, diamond certification does not trace individual stones back to their origin. While the Gemological Institute of America (GIA) provides a certification process for diamonds, it does not guarantee that a stone is conflict-free or produced under ethical conditions. The certification process focuses on ensuring the quality and authenticity of the diamond, not its ethical origins.
Furthermore, the majority of diamond purchases do not involve conflict diamonds. The vast majority of diamonds are mined and traded ethically, with rigorous standards in place. People who cannot or will not purchase fine diamonds are often the ones who rant about conflict diamonds. This indicates a disconnect between the realities of diamond sourcing and the concerns of some consumers.
Conclusion
While the term 'blood diamonds' has become synonymous with unethical practices, the reality is more complex. The Kimberley Process has significantly reduced the prevalence of conflict diamonds in Western Africa. Smaller-scale illicit trade still exists, but it is no longer the dominant threat it once was. Ethical standards in the diamond industry have improved, ensuring a more responsible and transparent supply chain.